Your pentest between pentests
Want a cleaner pentest report?
Run TurboPentest for $99 before testers arrive. We surface the issues a human pentest is likely to report. Each finding includes a Fix with AI prompt and retest commands so you can close it yourself. Testers also get an attack surface map and STRIDE threat model so their hours go to deeper testing, not recon.
Your target only. You prove ownership first. Find nothing? The next one is free.
Why expensive reports get noisy
Human testers are good. The first days of an engagement are still spent on findings you could have closed last week. That pads the PDF and burns the hours you paid for.
The login nobody rotated
Default credentials, a password reset that leaks, a session cookie that never dies. Testers try this on day one because it still works more often than anyone wants to admit.
The admin URL you thought was secret
/admin, a staging host, an old dashboard. Hiding a page behind a quiet URL is not a lock. It is a finding, and it pads the report.
The software you stopped updating
A plugin, a library, a TLS stack from 2019. Known holes have known recipes. Testers do not need to be clever when the CVE is already written.
The secret in the repo
API keys, tokens, connection strings. Connect GitHub and we look with Secret Scanner, Code Scanner, and Dep Scanner — the same class of issue a human tester will write up if it is still sitting there.
What we actually catch
This is a pentest, not a free checker. It is also not a replacement for a senior human who has a week inside your product.
What we catch well
Web, API, TLS, open ports and services, exposed admin, known CVEs, and secrets. Connect a GitHub repo and white-box adds source, dependency, and secret scanning. Same $99.
Business logic we do test
A specialist agent goes after workflow bypass, race conditions, and price or quantity tricks. That coverage is real. A senior human who lives in your product for a week will still go further on the bespoke, chained logic unique to your app.
What stays with the humans
Social engineering, physical security, and red team are not in scope. Use TurboPentest to clear the likely findings first so the expensive engagement spends its hours on depth. See AI vs human pentest.
AI vs human pentestThree steps before testers show up
Prove you own the target. Get a report in hours. Paste the Fix with AI prompt, retest yourself.
You prove it is yours
Buy the test and verify the domain. Nothing runs without that. Same ownership gate as every TurboPentest.
The agents go to work
14 scanning tools plus Paladin AI. Findings come with proof, severity, and how to close them — including business logic the agents can exercise.
Paste the Fix with AI prompt
Every finding is a prompt for Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, or any AI IDE, plus the retest commands to confirm it closed. Then hand testers the map and threat model so their kickoff is depth, not recon.
This is the document they will not have to write twice
Ranked findings, proof, remediation, retest commands. If we find nothing, your next pentest is free.
Penetration Test Report
ginandjuice.shop · 2026-03-29
Executive Summary
An automated black-box pentest identified 18 findings across all severity levels. The most severe include a complete admin panel access-control bypass (CVSS 10.0), plaintext credential disclosure, SQL injection, and blind XXE injection - each with proof-of-concept and remediation steps.
4
Critical
7
High
4
Medium
2
Low
1
Info
Admin Panel Access Control Bypass via X-Original-URL Header
Includes reproduction steps, proof-of-exploit, and remediation.
Close it in the AI IDE you already use
A cleaner report is not a wish. It is you pasting a prompt, shipping a fix, and retesting it before testers show up.
Fix with AI
Every finding ships a ready-to-paste prompt for Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Replit, or any AI IDE. The hole, the proof, and the fix — paste it, ship it. That is how the report actually gets cleaner before testers arrive.
Retest commands
The same check, ready to re-run. Confirm the patch landed. Do not wait for the human engagement to find out it did not.
Hand them a map, not a scavenger hunt
The PDF is useful. The jump-start is the attack surface map and STRIDE threat model sitting next to it. Testers skip hours of recon and spend those hours on deeper testing.
Attack surface map
Most-interesting endpoints with methods, parameters, and auth requirements. Open ports and services with versions. Tech stack. Authentication mechanisms and input vectors. Testers do not spend the first morning guessing what is even in scope.
STRIDE threat model
Prioritized manual-testing recommendations on the real surface, not a generic checklist. Where to dig next, ranked. That is hours of scoping they would otherwise bill you for.
What is still open
The PDF of remaining findings, with proof and retest commands for everything you already closed. They skip the noise and start on what is still interesting.
Pre-pentest checklist
The usual logistics — plus the $99 run those other checklists leave out.
01
Lock the scope
Write down the URLs, environments, and roles the testers will touch. Ambiguous scope wastes the hours you already paid for.
02
Tell monitoring
SOC, CDN, WAF, on-call. A surprise pentest looks like an incident. A scheduled one does not.
03
Provision test accounts
If the engagement is grey-box, dedicated accounts per role should exist before kickoff — not on the morning of day one.
04 · the missing step
Run TurboPentest for $99
This is the step every other prep checklist skips. Find the issues testers are likely to report. Each finding has a Fix with AI prompt you paste into Cursor, Claude Code, or Windsurf, plus retest commands so you can confirm before kickoff.
05
Hand testers the map
The remaining findings, plus a full attack surface map and a STRIDE threat model. Kickoff is deeper testing, not a scavenger hunt. Hours of their engagement now go to the hard stuff.
Questions people ask with testers already booked
Does this replace my human pentest?
No. This is the pentest between pentests — a $99 run so the expensive engagement is not spent rediscovering default credentials and stale TLS. Keep the human testers. Give them a cleaner surface, a map of it, and a threat model so their hours go to depth.
Will this guarantee a clean report?
No, and we will not claim that. We find the issues a human pentest is likely to write up, including business logic the agents can exercise. A senior tester will still go further on bespoke, chained logic unique to your app. Social engineering, physical, and red team stay with them.
What do I get besides a list of issues?
A ranked PDF with proof, remediation, Fix with AI prompts, and retest commands — plus an attack surface map (endpoints, ports and services, tech stack, auth and input vectors) and a STRIDE threat model with prioritized manual-testing recommendations. You close what you can. Testers walk in with the rest. A signed attestation letter follows the daily Merkle publish.
What is Fix with AI?
Every finding includes a copy-paste prompt for Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Copilot, or Replit. It describes the vulnerability and how to fix it. Paste it into the AI IDE you already write code in. Then retest yourself with the commands on the finding.
What do the human testers actually get from this?
They walk in with the remaining findings, a full attack surface map, and a STRIDE threat model. Day one is deeper testing on the interesting surface, not hours of recon you already paid for.
How long does it take?
Results in a few hours. You prove you own the target first. Nothing runs without that.
What if you find nothing?
If we find nothing, your next pentest is free. You can also explore a live demo first, with no card required.
Is $99 really the price?
Yes. $99 per target, flat. No subscription, no credit packs, no annual contract, no minimum. Deeper tiers exist if you want more agent hours. The door opens at $99.
Clear the likely findings first.
$99. Close what you can with Fix with AI. Then the humans start with a map and a threat model, not a blank page.
Want the longer version?