CWE-926: Improper Export of Android Application Components
The Android application exports a component for use by other applications, but does not properly restrict which applications can launch the component or access the data it contains.
How it's found
Improper Export of Android Application Components is a specific, narrowly defined instance of a broader pattern. Testers confirm it with targeted code review and a proof-of-concept input that exercises the exact code path this weakness describes.
The attacks and consequences of improperly exporting a component may depend on the exported component:If access to an exported Activity is not restricted, any application will be able to launch the activity. This may allow a malicious application to gain access to sensitive information, modify the internal state of the application, or trick a user into interacting with the victim application while believing they are still interacting with the malicious application. If access to an exported Service is not restricted, any application may start and bind to the Service. Depending on the exposed functionality, this may allow a malicious application to perform unauthorized actions, gain access to sensitive information, or corrupt the internal state of the application. If access to a Content Provider is not restricted to only the expected applications, then malicious applications might be able to access the sensitive data. Note that in Android before 4.2, the Content Provider is automatically exported unless it has been explicitly declared as NOT exported.
Consequences
- Unexpected State, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Instability, Varies by Context: Other applications, possibly untrusted, can launch the Activity.
- Unexpected State, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Instability, Varies by Context: Other applications, possibly untrusted, can bind to the Service.
- Read Application Data, Modify Application Data: Other applications, possibly untrusted, can read or modify the data that is offered by the Content Provider.
Mitigations
- Build and Compilation: If they do not need to be shared by other applications, explicitly mark components with android:exported="false" in the application manifest.
- Build and Compilation: If you only intend to use exported components between related apps under your control, use android:protectionLevel="signature" in the xml manifest to restrict access to applications signed by you.
- Build and Compilation/Architecture and Design: Limit Content Provider permissions (read/write) as appropriate.
- Build and Compilation/Architecture and Design: Limit Content Provider permissions (read/write) as appropriate.
Where this fits in a TurboPentest engagement
This weakness is not covered by the automated black-box pentest. IntegSec pentesters cover it in a manual engagement.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-926?
The Android application exports a component for use by other applications, but does not properly restrict which applications can launch the component or access the data it contains.
How do you find Improper Export of Android Application Components?
Improper Export of Android Application Components is a specific, narrowly defined instance of a broader pattern. Testers confirm it with targeted code review and a proof-of-concept input that exercises the exact code path this weakness describes.
What is the impact of CWE-926?
Unexpected State, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Instability, Varies by Context: Other applications, possibly untrusted, can launch the Activity. Unexpected State, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Instability, Varies by Context: Other applications, possibly untrusted, can bind to the Service. Read Application Data, Modify Application Data: Other applications, possibly untrusted, can read or modify the data that is offered by the Content Provider.
Does TurboPentest test for Improper Export of Android Application Components?
This weakness is not covered by the automated black-box pentest. IntegSec pentesters cover it in a manual engagement.
Related CWEs
Written and reviewed by
Michel Chamberland - Founder & CEO, IntegSec
CISSP, OSCP, OSCE, CEH, GIAC, CCSK · 20+ years in offensive security
Michel has spent 20+ years on offensive security teams including IBM X-Force Red and Trustwave SpiderLabs, leading penetration tests, red team engagements, and breach response for Fortune 500 customers. He is the founder of IntegSec and the architect of TurboPentest.
Find these issues before an attacker does
TurboPentest runs an agentic AI pentest against your target and reports findings with proof, from $99 per target.
Start a pentest