CWE-785: Use of Path Manipulation Function without Maximum-sized Buffer
The product invokes a function for normalizing paths or file names, but it provides an output buffer that is smaller than the maximum possible size, such as PATH_MAX.
How it's found
Use of Path Manipulation Function without Maximum-sized Buffer is a specific, narrowly defined instance of a broader pattern. Testers confirm it with targeted code review and a proof-of-concept input that exercises the exact code path this weakness describes.
Passing an inadequately-sized output buffer to a path manipulation function can result in a buffer overflow. Such functions include realpath(), readlink(), PathAppend(), and others.
Consequences
- Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Mitigations
- Implementation: Always specify output buffers large enough to handle the maximum-size possible result from path manipulation functions.
Where this fits in a TurboPentest engagement
TurboPentest's agentic pentest is powerful and covers a broad range of issues automatically. This particular class is best confirmed in a manual IntegSec engagement, where human pentesters apply deeper methodology and a larger context window than any automated pass.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-785?
The product invokes a function for normalizing paths or file names, but it provides an output buffer that is smaller than the maximum possible size, such as PATH_MAX.
How do you find Use of Path Manipulation Function without Maximum-sized Buffer?
Use of Path Manipulation Function without Maximum-sized Buffer is a specific, narrowly defined instance of a broader pattern. Testers confirm it with targeted code review and a proof-of-concept input that exercises the exact code path this weakness describes.
What is the impact of CWE-785?
Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Does TurboPentest test for Use of Path Manipulation Function without Maximum-sized Buffer?
TurboPentest's agentic pentest is powerful and covers a broad range of issues automatically. This particular class is best confirmed in a manual IntegSec engagement, where human pentesters apply deeper methodology and a larger context window than any automated pass.
Related CWEs
Find these issues before an attacker does
TurboPentest runs an agentic AI pentest against your target and reports findings with proof, from $99 per target.
Start a $99 pentest