CWE-641: Improper Restriction of Names for Files and Other Resources
The product constructs the name of a file or other resource using input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the resulting name.
How it's found
Improper Restriction of Names for Files and Other Resources is typically found by tracing untrusted input from where it enters the system to the point where it is used without the check or neutralization this weakness describes, combining manual code review with dynamic testing.
This may produce resultant weaknesses. For instance, if the names of these resources contain scripting characters, it is possible that a script may get executed in the client's browser if the application ever displays the name of the resource on a dynamically generated web page. Alternately, if the resources are consumed by some application parser, a specially crafted name can exploit some vulnerability internal to the parser, potentially resulting in execution of arbitrary code on the server machine. The problems will vary based on the context of usage of such malformed resource names and whether vulnerabilities are present in or assumptions are made by the targeted technology that would make code execution possible.
Consequences
- Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands: Execution of arbitrary code in the context of usage of the resources with dangerous names.
- Read Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart: Crash of the consumer code of these resources resulting in information leakage or denial of service.
Mitigations
- Architecture and Design: Do not allow users to control names of resources used on the server side.
- Architecture and Design: Perform allowlist input validation at entry points and also before consuming the resources. Reject bad file names rather than trying to cleanse them.
- Architecture and Design: Make sure that technologies consuming the resources are not vulnerable (e.g. buffer overflow, format string, etc.) in a way that would allow code execution if the name of the resource is malformed.
Where this fits in a TurboPentest engagement
TurboPentest's agentic pentest is powerful and covers a broad range of issues automatically. This particular class is best confirmed in a manual IntegSec engagement, where human pentesters apply deeper methodology and a larger context window than any automated pass.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-641?
The product constructs the name of a file or other resource using input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the resulting name.
How do you find Improper Restriction of Names for Files and Other Resources?
Improper Restriction of Names for Files and Other Resources is typically found by tracing untrusted input from where it enters the system to the point where it is used without the check or neutralization this weakness describes, combining manual code review with dynamic testing.
What is the impact of CWE-641?
Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands: Execution of arbitrary code in the context of usage of the resources with dangerous names. Read Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart: Crash of the consumer code of these resources resulting in information leakage or denial of service.
Does TurboPentest test for Improper Restriction of Names for Files and Other Resources?
TurboPentest's agentic pentest is powerful and covers a broad range of issues automatically. This particular class is best confirmed in a manual IntegSec engagement, where human pentesters apply deeper methodology and a larger context window than any automated pass.
Related CWEs
Find these issues before an attacker does
TurboPentest runs an agentic AI pentest against your target and reports findings with proof, from $99 per target.
Start a $99 pentest