CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup
The product does not properly "clean up" and remove temporary or supporting resources after they have been used.
How it's found
Incomplete Cleanup is typically found by tracing untrusted input from where it enters the system to the point where it is used without the check or neutralization this weakness describes, combining manual code review with dynamic testing.
Consequences
- Other, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, DoS: Resource Consumption (Other): It is possible to overflow the number of temporary files because directories typically have limits on the number of files allowed. This could create a denial of service problem.
Mitigations
- Architecture and Design/Implementation: Temporary files and other supporting resources should be deleted/released immediately after they are no longer needed.
Where this fits in a TurboPentest engagement
TurboPentest's agentic pentest is powerful and covers a broad range of issues automatically. This particular class is best confirmed in a manual IntegSec engagement, where human pentesters apply deeper methodology and a larger context window than any automated pass.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-459?
The product does not properly "clean up" and remove temporary or supporting resources after they have been used.
How do you find Incomplete Cleanup?
Incomplete Cleanup is typically found by tracing untrusted input from where it enters the system to the point where it is used without the check or neutralization this weakness describes, combining manual code review with dynamic testing.
What is the impact of CWE-459?
Other, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, DoS: Resource Consumption (Other): It is possible to overflow the number of temporary files because directories typically have limits on the number of files allowed. This could create a denial of service problem.
Does TurboPentest test for Incomplete Cleanup?
TurboPentest's agentic pentest is powerful and covers a broad range of issues automatically. This particular class is best confirmed in a manual IntegSec engagement, where human pentesters apply deeper methodology and a larger context window than any automated pass.
Related CWEs
- Class weaknessCWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
- Base weaknessCWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
- Base weaknessCWE-215: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code
- Variant weaknessCWE-219: Storage of File with Sensitive Data Under Web Root
- Base weaknessCWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
- Base weaknessCWE-489: Active Debug Code
Find these issues before an attacker does
TurboPentest runs an agentic AI pentest against your target and reports findings with proof, from $99 per target.
Start a $99 pentest